Hyundai Palisade 2nd Generation (2026-present) vs Toyota Grand Highlander 1st Generation (2024-present)

13.28 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “Engine stall or loss of power” is the most frequently matched narrative (9 reports).

15.74 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “Engine stall or loss of power” is the most frequently matched narrative (56 reports).

EPA estimates $1,800–$3,250 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $2,467–$3,822.

EPA estimates $1,700–$2,800 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $2,467–$3,822.

The Palisade prioritizes calm, predictable control and an easy steering effort; it grips securely but cannot disguise its mass when direction changes become abrupt.

The Grand Highlander remains predictable at family-driving speeds, but soft responses, body roll and its large footprint make it the least engaging vehicle in these comparisons.

A smooth ride, generous seating, and extensive climate equipment produce a near-luxury experience across long family trips.

The ride is smooth and all three rows are adult-friendly, though some lower-cabin materials feel utilitarian.

All three rows can carry adults and the adjustable third row improves the passenger-versus-cargo tradeoff, although storage with every seat occupied is still finite.

The usable third row and generous cargo capacity directly solve the regular Highlander's packaging weakness.

The feature set is one of the segment's strongest, but early failures in seat-control integration materially reduce confidence in system stability.

A quick 12.3-inch screen, wireless connectivity, and available low-speed hands-free assistance put it near the front of its 2024 class.