Toyota Highlander 4th Generation (2020-present) vs Toyota Grand Highlander 1st Generation (2024-present)

15.80 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “Transmission hesitation or failure” is the most frequently matched narrative (196 reports).

15.74 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “Engine stall or loss of power” is the most frequently matched narrative (56 reports).

The latest rated model year is 2025, with 5 stars. QuickCarFixes converts the conservative configuration result to its 10-point scale.

The latest rated model year is 2025, with 5 stars. QuickCarFixes converts the conservative configuration result to its 10-point scale.

EPA estimates $1,750–$2,550 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $2,835–$3,661.

EPA estimates $1,700–$2,800 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $2,467–$3,822.

Predictable responses and manageable body movement make the Highlander secure, but trim-dependent tuning and limited road feel stop it short of the sharper crossovers.

The Grand Highlander remains predictable at family-driving speeds, but soft responses, body roll and its large footprint make it the least engaging vehicle in these comparisons.

The Highlander is relaxed and comfortable in the first two rows, with no exceptional weakness in normal family driving.

The ride is smooth and all three rows are adult-friendly, though some lower-cabin materials feel utilitarian.

Front and second-row space is good, but the tight third row and reduced cargo room with it raised are decisive limitations.

The usable third row and generous cargo capacity directly solve the regular Highlander's packaging weakness.

Toyota's larger interface and wireless conveniences are current and straightforward, but not notably ahead of 2024 peers.

A quick 12.3-inch screen, wireless connectivity, and available low-speed hands-free assistance put it near the front of its 2024 class.