Subaru Forester 6th Generation (2025-present) vs Toyota RAV4 6th Generation (2026-present)

4.30 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “Sunroof or window glass shattered” is the most frequently matched narrative (16 reports).

6.42 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “False automatic emergency braking” is the most frequently matched narrative (5 reports).

EPA estimates $1,750–$2,350 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $2,251–$2,835.

EPA estimates $1,450–$1,600 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $1,835–$2,251.

Strong visibility, predictable AWD behavior and controlled suspension make the Forester reassuring, while vague on-center steering prevents a higher score.

The redesigned RAV4 feels planted, responsive and easy to maneuver, though its light control weighting favors accessibility over detailed road feedback.

The redesign improves seat mounting, ride isolation, and cabin quietness while preserving the Forester's excellent visibility.

Isolation appears improved and the ride remains easy to live with, but seat comfort varies enough by trim and driver shape to prevent a stronger early score.

Headroom, outward visibility, rear space, wide-opening access, and a square cargo area remain defining strengths.

Passenger and cargo packaging remain practical, though tall-driver knee clearance and some console padding details draw criticism.

Wireless connectivity and camera coverage are competitive, but slow Starlink responses and screen-based climate controls make the system feel behind the best rivals.

Toyota made a substantial hardware and software step forward, but moving several climate functions onto the screen and early phone-projection bugs reduce real-world usability.