Toyota RAV4 6th Generation (2026-present) vs Honda CR-V 6th Generation (2023-present)

6.42 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “False automatic emergency braking” is the most frequently matched narrative (5 reports).

15.15 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “Steering assist loss or lockup” is the most frequently matched narrative (121 reports).

EPA estimates $1,450–$1,600 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $1,835–$2,251.

EPA estimates $0–$2,100 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $1,025–$3,142.

The redesigned RAV4 feels planted, responsive and easy to maneuver, though its light control weighting favors accessibility over detailed road feedback.

Accurate steering and settled body control make the CR-V reassuring on ordinary roads, though feedback and agility remain tuned for secure family driving rather than driver involvement.

Isolation appears improved and the ride remains easy to live with, but seat comfort varies enough by trim and driver shape to prevent a stronger early score.

The ride and climate execution are strong, but recurring seat-shape complaints prevent a class-leading comfort score.

Passenger and cargo packaging remain practical, though tall-driver knee clearance and some console padding details draw criticism.

Rear legroom, reclining seatbacks, cargo volume, and easy access are major CR-V strengths.

Toyota made a substantial hardware and software step forward, but moving several climate functions onto the screen and early phone-projection bugs reduce real-world usability.

The system is clear and usable with current phone integration, though base trims and screen sizes are conservative rather than cutting-edge.