Generation comparison

Nissan Frontier 3rd Generation (2022-present) vs Toyota Tacoma 4th Generation (2024-present)

Nissan Frontier 3rd Generation (2022-present) studio view

3rd Generation · 2022-present

Nissan Frontier

210.2″–224.1″ L × 73.0″–74.7″ W × 71.3″–72.9″ H · 126.0″–139.8″ wheelbase

VS
Toyota Tacoma 4th Generation (2024-present) studio view

4th Generation · 2024-present

Toyota Tacoma

213.0″–226.2″ L × 76.9″–77.9″ W × 73.8″–74.7″ H · 131.9″–145.1″ wheelbase

Reliability30% weight
8.6/10

9.96 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “Engine stall or loss of power” is the most frequently matched narrative (52 reports).

9.7/10

5.43 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “Transmission hesitation or failure” is the most frequently matched narrative (21 reports).

NCAP safety25% weight
8.0/10

The latest rated model year is 2022, with 4 stars. QuickCarFixes converts the conservative configuration result to its 10-point scale.

8.0/10

The latest rated model year is 2025, with 4 stars. QuickCarFixes converts the conservative configuration result to its 10-point scale.

Energy cost15% weight
7.7/10

EPA estimates $2,950–$3,400 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $3,189–$3,788.

4.4/10

EPA estimates $2,650–$3,100 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $2,613–$3,255.

Handling10% weight
7.2/10

The Frontier is stable and predictable, but heavy low-speed steering and a less polished chassis make it harder work than the newer Ranger or unibody Maverick.

7.8/10

The Tacoma feels stable and easier to place than its predecessor, with controlled body movement; steering feedback remains filtered and off-road tires soften response.

Comfort8% weight
7.8/10

Excellent front-seat support carries the Frontier over long distances, while highway noise and a traditionally truck-like ride keep the overall result short of luxury territory.

7.1/10

The redesigned driving position and ride are better than before, but seat comfort remains polarizing and off-road trims can feel busy on broken pavement.

Roominess7% weight
6.4/10

The front row is accommodating, but rear legroom and behind-seat storage trail the roomier midsize pickups.

5.9/10

Front occupants get useful adjustment, but the Double Cab rear bench loses the contest for adult legroom and cabin storage is only average for a midsize truck.

Onboard electronics5% weight
7.5/10

The interface is simple and stable, and later models add a larger screen and wireless integration; the analog-heavy cabin still lacks the display breadth of newer rivals.

7.7/10

The optional 14-inch screen is crisp and feature-rich, but the base display is less impressive and owner reports of slow starts or connectivity glitches reduce the stability mark.

Final scoreToo close to call
7.9/10head-to-head score
7.7/10head-to-head score

Scores use federal safety and ownership data plus documented editorial ratings. Learn how QuickCarFixes calculates and compares scores here.

NHTSA ODI complaints

Reliability and recurring problems

Nissan Frontier

Reliability
8.6/10
ODI reports
356
Reports per 10,000 produced
9.96
Severe-event share
8.4%

Most frequently matched narratives

  1. Engine stall or loss of power52
  2. Battery drain or no-start34
  3. Brake failure or reduced braking25
  4. Driver-assistance or sensor failure20
  5. Door, hatch, or latch failure15

Toyota Tacoma

Reliability
9.7/10
ODI reports
314
Reports per 10,000 produced
5.43
Severe-event share
6.1%

Most frequently matched narratives

  1. Transmission hesitation or failure21
  2. Engine stall or loss of power19
  3. Brake failure or reduced braking17
  4. Infotainment or display blackout11
  5. Door, hatch, or latch failure9
NHTSA safety data

Crash-test coverage and recalls

Nissan Frontier

NCAP score
8.0/10
Latest rated model year
2022
Recall campaigns
13
Completion rates reported
13/13
Median reported completion
89.2%
Park-it / park-outside campaigns
0 / 0

Toyota Tacoma

NCAP score
8.0/10
Latest rated model year
2025
Recall campaigns
6
Completion rates reported
4/6
Median reported completion
63.8%
Park-it / park-outside campaigns
0 / 0
EPA FuelEconomy.gov

Annual energy cost against comparable vehicles

Nissan Frontier

Energy-cost score
7.7/10
EPA model year
2026
Estimated annual energy cost
$2,950–$3,400
Comparable-class average
$3,189–$3,788
Difference from comparable average
-$538–-$239

Toyota Tacoma

Energy-cost score
4.4/10
EPA model year
2026
Estimated annual energy cost
$2,650–$3,100
Comparable-class average
$2,613–$3,255
Difference from comparable average
-$605–$281
Documented editorial review

Handling, comfort, space and onboard electronics

Nissan Frontier

Handling
7.2/10
Comfort
7.8/10
Roominess
6.4/10
Onboard electronics
7.5/10

Toyota Tacoma

Handling
7.8/10
Comfort
7.1/10
Roominess
5.9/10
Onboard electronics
7.7/10