Toyota Tundra 3rd Generation (2022-present) vs Toyota Tacoma 4th Generation (2024-present)

33.83 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “Engine stall or loss of power” is the most frequently matched narrative (300 reports).

5.43 ODI reports were recorded per 10,000 EWR-produced vehicles. “Transmission hesitation or failure” is the most frequently matched narrative (21 reports).

The latest rated model year is 2025, with 5 stars. QuickCarFixes converts the conservative configuration result to its 10-point scale.

The latest rated model year is 2025, with 4 stars. QuickCarFixes converts the conservative configuration result to its 10-point scale.

EPA estimates $2,800–$4,000 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $3,060–$3,788.

EPA estimates $2,650–$3,100 in annual energy cost for the latest configurations. Comparable vehicles average $2,613–$3,255.

The coil-spring chassis is settled and predictable for a full-size pickup, but slow responses and the broad footprint limit agility in tighter roads and parking lots.

The Tacoma feels stable and easier to place than its predecessor, with controlled body movement; steering feedback remains filtered and off-road tires soften response.

The coil-spring rear suspension gives this full-size truck a settled ride, and the broad front seats work well over distance; tire and TRD-package choices still affect noise and firmness.

The redesigned driving position and ride are better than before, but seat comfort remains polarizing and off-road trims can feel busy on broken pavement.

CrewMax rear space is genuinely adult-sized and the front cabin is broad, though the tall step-in and hybrid battery packaging reduce some practical space.

Front occupants get useful adjustment, but the Double Cab rear bench loses the contest for adult legroom and cabin storage is only average for a midsize truck.

The available 14-inch interface and wireless integration look current and respond quickly, but several common functions demand screen interaction and equipment differs sharply by trim.

The optional 14-inch screen is crisp and feature-rich, but the base display is less impressive and owner reports of slow starts or connectivity glitches reduce the stability mark.